ICANLonline

MedPAC Recommends A New Direction For Medicare

WITH A FOCUS ON DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING


from the June 2005 issue

The issue of reimbursement policy, one that quite often shares the spotlight with accreditation, has come into sharper focus recently as it relates to diagnostic imaging procedures, including nuclear cardiology, general nuclear medicine, and PET. With payments for imaging services increasing in double-digit percentages each year, insurance carriers are looking for ways to reduce costly, repeat procedures and ensure that they are only paying for the most accurate diagnoses possible. Buzz phrases such as "pay for quality" and "reduction of inappropriate use" are being used by insurers as they seek objective, reliable, expert guidelines for providers of imaging services. Adoption of such guidelines is intended to ensure that imaging providers are delivering high quality imaging services to patients while at the same time helping to control the rapid growth of imaging spending.

The Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC), an independent federal body established by the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (P.L. 105-33), serves to advise Congress on issues affecting the Medicare program. MedPAC not only advises Congress on payments to private health plans participating in Medicare, but also analyzes access to care, quality of care, and other issues affecting the overall program as well as the nation's healthcare system in general. MedPAC recommends changes to payment and other policies that are designed to make payments more accurate and improve the value of care. MedPAC's goal is "for Medicare payments to cover the costs efficient providers incur in furnishing care to beneficiaries."

Within the March 2005 MedPAC report, the topic of the rapid growth related to Medicare spending for imaging services was addressed within Chapter 3, entitled, "Issues In Physician Payment Policy."

The MedPAC report outlined several factors as justification for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)' future setting of standards for physicians who bill Medicare for the professional component of imaging studies:

  • advances in imaging technology that have made it possible to provide services in non-hospital settings;
  • the migration of imaging from hospitals, which establish criteria for who may interpret studies, to non-facility settings, where there are often no such rules;
  • rapid growth in physician fee schedule spending for imaging services; and
  • variations in the quality of physician interpretations and reports, which can affect treatment decisions.
 

Within the chapter entitled "Issues In Physician Payment Policy," MedPAC provides Congress with potential solutions toward enhancing the quality of care as well as controlling spending. Here, MedPAC announces specific recommendations related to diagnostic imaging studies and this particular aspect of healthcare delivery:

MEDPAC RECOMMENDATIONS TO CONGRESS: March 2005 Reports

3A The Secretary should use Medicare claims data to measure fee-for-service physicians' resource use and share results with physicians confidentially to educate them about how they compare with aggregated peer performance. The Congress should direct the Secretary to perform this function.

COMMISSIONER VOTES: YES 16 . NO 0 . NOT VOTING 0 . ABSENT 1
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3B The Secretary should improve Medicare's coding edits that detect unbundled diagnostic imaging services and reduce the technical component payment for multiple imaging services performed on contiguous body parts.

COMMISSIONER VOTES: YES 16 . NO 0 . NOT VOTING 0 . ABSENT 1
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3C The Congress should direct the Secretary to set standards for physicians who bill Medicare for interpreting diagnostic imaging studies. The Secretary should select private organizations to administer the standards.

COMMISSIONER VOTES: YES 16 . NO 0 . NOT VOTING 0 . ABSENT 1
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3D The Congress should direct the Secretary to set standards for all providers who bill Medicare for performing diagnostic imaging studies. The Secretary should select private organizations to administer the standards.

COMMISSIONER VOTES: YES 16 . NO 0 . NOT VOTING 0 . ABSENT 1
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3E The Secretary should include nuclear medicine and PET procedures as designated health services under the Ethics in Patient Referrals Act.

COMMISSIONER VOTES: YES 16 . NO 0 . NOT VOTING 0 . ABSENT 1
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3F The Secretary should expand the definition of physician ownership in the Ethics in Patient Referrals Act to include interests in an entity that derives a substantial proportion of its revenue from a provider of designated health services.

COMMISSIONER VOTES: YES 16 . NO 0 . NOT VOTING 0 . ABSENT 1

NOTE: The full version of the March 2005 MedPAC report to Congress can be accessed at http://medpac.gov/publications/congressional_reports/Mar05_Ch03.pdf.

NEXT PAGE >>


Top of Page

 

Online
Accreditation

Log In Here

EXISTING APPLICANTS
Already have a User ID and Password?
Access your account here.


NEW APPLICANTS
New to Online Accreditation? Get started here.

<< Back to News

JOIN THE NEWSLETTER MAILING LIST!
Submit your request form to receive future issues of the ICANL Newsletter.

THE NEWSLETTER ARCHIVE
Now you can also view this article within the ICANL Newsletter in which it was first published.

June 2005 (3.1 mb)


All newsletters open using the free Adobe Reader or any previous version of Adobe Acrobat Reader. If not already installed on your computer, download the Adobe Reader.

ICAVLonline ICAELonline ICAMRLonline ICACTLonline
Copyright 1997-2008 ICANL, 8830 Stanford Boulevard, Suite 306, Columbia, MD 21045. All rights reserved.