|
<<
BACK
A
review of ASNC's recently revised Imaging Guidelines for
Nuclear Cardiology Procedures, published June 2006, will
aid nuclear laboratories with information addressing the advancement
of imaging equipment and specific equipment requirements. Some
of this is information not currently included in the ICANL
Standards.
Furthermore,
Part II, Section 3.3 of the ICANL Standards requires
non-imaging equipment quality control. A policy must exist and
be followed for routine inspection and testing of all non-imaging
equipment, such as dose calibrators, uptake probes, survey meters,
and glucometers, if indicated, and be in accordance with all
federal, state and local requirements. The dose calibrator must
be calibrated in accordance with nationally recognized standards
or the manufacturer's specifications.
|
EQUIPMENT
Dose calibrator
. . .
Dose calibrator
. . .
Dose calibrator
. . .
Survey meter
. . .
Glucometer .
. .
|
TEST
Constancy . .
.
Linearity . . .
Accuracy . . .
Calibration . .
.
Accuracy . . .
|
FREQUENCY
Daily Quarterly Annually Annually Daily
|
|
ASNC's
Imaging Guidelines for Nuclear Cardiology Procedures,
published June 2006, provide detailed explanations of quality
control procedures and are available for review and download
from www.asnc.org.
An example of some of the QC recommendations included in the
ASNC guidelines that provide clarification for the ICANL requirements
in Part II, Section 3 of the Standards include:
1)
Daily floods may be intrinsic or extrinsic acquired in 128x128
or 256x256 matrix of 3 million counts or greater. CFOV, UFOV
or time/acquisition should be documented for tracking sensitivity
and drift.
2)
Energy windows should be symmetric about the photopeak and
checked daily for each isotope used.
3)
Dose Calibrator background must be checked daily and at least
one constancy source checked for all isotopes used (e.g.,
CS-137).
4)
Survey meter, GM counter must be checked for battery function,
background and assure constancy with a check source.
5)
Scintillation/wipe test counter/well counter - daily background
and sealed source constancy.
6)
PET scanner - Specific to system, blank scan, transmission
image
7)
Hybrid SPECT/CT and PET/CT must be quality controlled for
each system independently as well as together for fusion accuracy
and reliability
The
Procedure Guidelines Manual August 2003 published by
the SNM, Version 2.0, February 1997, is another valuable reference
for QC procedure guidelines. The ICANL Standards are
based upon these published guidelines as well as the ASNC guidelines
referenced above; therefore, nuclear medicine laboratories applying
for accreditation are encouraged to carefully review these documents.
In
the course of reviewing laboratory operations, ICANL reviewers
often find that applicant laboratories are not in full compliance
with required quality control guidelines. Deficient areas are
most often found in uniformity corrections, sensitivity testing
for tracking change over time, and collimator integrity. The
purpose and history of these parameters is discussed below to
provide further insight to applicant laboratories.
UNIFORMITY VALUES
The
National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) standards
are not the same for all cameras, thus the Integral and Differential
Intrinsic Uniformity is not the same for all cameras. However,
ASNC guidelines recommend these numbers be under five percent
(5%) and preferably in the range of three percent (3%). Each
laboratory should be aware of their system limits and monitor
uniformity closely for evidence of drift accordingly. The Central
Field of View (CFOV) is the most sensitive in that one percent
(1%) non-uniformity at the center of the image will become a
20% non-uniformity in the reconstructed image. Establishing
trigger levels for service calls is a safe and reliable way
to maintain camera integrity. Recommended but not required by
the ICANL is the use of a phantom to ensure that all corrections
are working: uniformity, energy, linearity, center of rotation,
head registration and attenuation correction. But without daily,
weekly, monthly, and quarterly QC, the semi-annual or yearly
phantom cannot indicate when a problem has developed or how
long the camera has been drifting toward irregularities.
NEXT PAGE >>
Top
of Page
|